Skip to main content

Regulatory Regime and Infrastructure Development

In the Indian context a fad word or phrase has all takers, academicians, politicians, bureaucrats, and the layman in the common mass. In recent times regulatory nuisance has become nonsense..., somebody says scrap it, others say have more and more regulatory frameworks in India because only such frameworks are going to free India from regressive bureaucratic control. One of the recent fad phrases has been "regulation and infrastructure development" and people believe religiously that ideal (debatable) regulatory framework creates infrastructure for the economy. Some available literatures need appreciation on this context:

All said and done; is it correct to say that a regulatory framework per se leads to infrastructure creation and development. Furthermore Mohan Pyare says that this is all a World Bank gimmick, they want to free economies from the governmental control so that global capitalist economy could be established. Seems interesting...but I do not think this is applicable to India...high governmental hand in regulatory system...? Mohan Pyare believes that regulatory framework is just an extended form of executive authority in India.. If this is true then why to burden the governmental coffer by creating a regulatory framework? may not be. But how regulator would create infrastructure? Is regulator going to scout investors? may not be. Then how regulatory framework would create infrastructure? Indeed it will…by creating demand or way this is not the function of a regulator. I am seeking this answer from Mohan Pyare, hope to get it by next week.


Popular posts from this blog

Teaching-Democracy-Secularism and We the People

This is very relevant today to talk about the way teaching is designed in schools, which is foundation of a nation. In India we have Hindu Schools, Muslim Schools, Christian Schools so on and so forth but constitutional mandate makes us secular! Do we relate ourselves with religious study? Religion has guided human beings for centuries and it preceded Rule of Law. Is to correct to advocate religious study? Is to puerile to counter secularism with religious study? Isn't rational, reason  religion part of the bag conscience ?

To me religion is Dharma and Dharma only ...Dharma is understanding / respecting all life and non life forms. Learning is incomplete without studying Dharma in this sense religion is the bedrock of a civilized society. Swami Ranganathananda of Ramakrishna Mission, in Eternal Values for a Changing Society: Education for Human Excellence, Vol. 3, has identified objectives, which should be achieved by education. If we focus on these objectives we may find what an…

Thus Spake My Lord

Lord Krishna at the time of his departure from this world gave instructions to Uddhava. Uddhava had asked: What are the symptoms of pure devotees? How can we become pure devotees? How can we achieve uttama-bhakti (pure devotional service)? In this connection, Krsna replied:
“O Uddhava, a saintly person is merciful and never injures others. Even if others are aggressive, he is tolerant and forgiving toward all living entities. His strength and meaning in life come from the truth itself, he is free from all envy and jealousy, and his mind is equal in material happiness and distress.” (Srimad-Bhagavatam 11.11.29)]

“O My dear Uddhava, My devotee is very merciful. He cannot tolerate the sufferings of the conditioned souls. That is why, like Narada, he travels throughout the world, without invitation.”